Angiel EnviroSafe, Inc.
An environmental company
using airborne remote sensing for GIS applications
| Oil spill detection and mapping | Fire mapping and detection |
| Wetland Mapping | Geothermal mapping |
| Marine mammal counts | Ground water discharge |
| Thermal discharge mapping (including pollutants) | Search and rescue |
| Soil moisture studies | Plant stress detection |
| Geothermal exploration | Volcanology |
| Locating buried pipelines | Pipeline leak discovery, monitoring, and mapping |
| Ground water discharge | Offshore spring mapping |
| Military applications, homeland security | and more |
Fire mapping: The fire mapping shown below from the US Forest Service.

Plant stress: The following USDA image (and most of the text) is a thermal image of a cotton canopy that was part of a water and nitrogen study in Arizona. Blues and greens represent lower temperatures than yellow and orange. The image, showing plant stress, was acquired with a thermal scanner, similar to the Daedalus shown below. Most of the blue rectangles (plots) in the image correspond to high water treatments. However, note that many of the patterns do not correspond to the treatment plots, but represent the natural variability in soil conditions across the field.
If the field above were irrigated uniformly, some areas of the field would receive more water than the plants need, while other areas would not receive enough.
Therefore, varying the application across the field could reduce water use without significant impact on crop yield. The same would be true of utilizing fertilizers.
Oil spill mapping:

Oil spill mapping, detection and monitoring using thermal IR and UV channels. The UV provides oil spill mapping while the IR is used for oil spill thickness estimates. (See oil spill study below)
Angiel EnviroSafe uses the Daedalus ABS (Airborne Bispectral Imager) system mounted in the camera hole of a Piper Aztec twin engine airplane. We can bring this unit to almost ANY site for your needs. This unit has been a proven performer for years.
The ABS has a wide 86 degree field of view. This unit images over two times more per pass than a 36 degree unit. It collects data in the 8 to 12 micron band (Long Wave IR) and in the 360 to 380 nanometer band (UV).
Oil spill mapping, fire mapping and detection, wetland and thermal mapping are only some of the capabilities of the Deadalus system. Wetland mapping, plant stress, homeland security, thermal mapping, fire mapping and more are all provided by Angiel EnviroSafe with this imager.
Oil Spill mapping is discussed in the NOAA study below. Fire mapping is shown above. The same imager, Daedalus, is in use by the US Forest Service in its fire mapping efforts. Thermal mapping is used for marine mammal counts, plate tectonics, volcanology, plant stress, and much more.
Most importantly, Angiel EnviroSafe is prepared to modify our instrument for any applications. This Daedalus imager can have a total of 10 bands. As a result of our affiliation with Advanced Photonics we now have the capability of adding any number of instruments or bands, including lasers, exact temperature probe, UV, visible, and IR bands to the Daedalus imager or mounted and flown separately. This would add to our substantial capabilities of wetland, plant stress, fire, oil spill and environmental mapping.
HOMELAND SECURITY
We have been proposing homeland security services to the Federal Government and some States since the early 1990's.
For more information please contact:
Telephone in the U.S. (786) 897-5562
Email: pierreangiel@aol.com
Angiel EnviroSafe, Inc.
REVIEW OF SOME REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS FOR OIL SPILLS
William Lehr
Debra Simecek-Beatty
Office of Response and Restoration
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
ABSTRACT
Remote sensing has
been applied to track oil spill trajectories for more than four
decades. Both active and passive sensors,
using aircraft and satellite platforms, have been used with varying degrees
of success. This paper reviews some of the common bands in the
electromagnetic spectrum suitable for following
oil spills. An analysis of the relative strengths and weaknesses
of sensors utilizing those bands is
provided, with evaluations of their likely detection capability and
capacity to discriminate
oil slicks from other surface phenomena. Since interest in using the
new generation
of satellites for spill detection is increasing, the paper provides a realistic
assessment of the economic and logistic
challenges facing widespread use of this remote sensing platform. An example of
remote sensing use for a recent spill event off the coast of
INTRODUCTION
The world’s energy needs require
the shipment of large quantities of crude oil and refined products by sea.
With these shipments, come the small but continuing threat of oil spills and
the subsequent
threat to the environment. Both international organizations and national
response agencies have developed response plans and specialized cleanup teams to
combat these spills. These teams can respond to small,
nearshore spills by relying upon on-scene observations from beach crews,
vessel observations, and visual overflights with small aircraft.
However, for large offshore
spills, knowledge of the current position of the slick
is needed,
both for short-term tactical requirements and for longer-term predictions of the
future location of the slicks. This latter operation requires the use of
computer-based trajectory models, which themselves must be initialized and
calibrated using observations obtained in near real-time.
Logistic considerations may make
sole reliance on visual overflights by small aircraft
impractical. Due to the dynamic nature of the motion
of oil slicks, old data is not very useful. Both the time scale for slick location and the area
coverage are critical components. The coverage should be synoptic and the time scale needs to be
of the order of a few hours to provide effective response information. False positives need to be identified
and removed. These are difficult requirements. It is the challenge for any
remote sensing system to sufficiently meet these requirements so as to
provide a practical spill response
tool.
Thermal infrared
(IR)
These sensors detect the natural
thermal radiation from a warm object, which usually peaks in the infrared range. Oil is
discriminated from water by an apparent temperature difference due to a slight difference in emissivity
between the two fluids, Oil will appear to the IR sensors somewhat cooler than water of the same
temperature. Unfortunately, real temperature differences in the surface water can give a signature
similar to the oil slick. Also, thick, dark oil can absorb solar radiation and become warmer than
the surrounding water. Thus, one of the challenges using a thermal IR instrument
is calibrating it to detect oil, recognizing that an oil slick,
depending upon the conditions, may give a warmer or cooler signal than the
water background. IR cameras can be mounted on a variety of platforms
or even be used as hand-held devices. Attempts have been made to use IR to estimate absolute
slick thickness with questionable results. However, there has been some success using IR to
determine relative thickness of the slick. This information can be used to direct
response teams to the main oil concentrations.
Ultraviolet (UV) and
visible spectrum
Oil is much more reflective than
water in the UV band and shows as a bright object when illuminated by a suitable source of UV
light, such as the sun. Even thin layers of oil will give
a strong signal.
There are no strong spectral features in the visual band. Oil is detected by
a difference in
reflectivity and by the shape of the slick. Many other ocean features, such as
cloud shadows, can be, and
often are, confused with oil slicks. Both UV and visual are attenuated by
rain, clouds or fog. For such
conditions, longer wavelengths are required.